You know, nothing pisses me off more than hearing well-off people whinging and putting down people on benefits. It really makes me do a slow burn..makes me want to kick the naysayers--usually men, I've noticed, in the nuts.
Sure, there's people on benefits who don't want to work--hell, I've known, and currently know, a few. But, more than half the people on benefits DON'T WANT to be on benefits!
Many of those on benefits have only the other alternative of literally starving or freezing to death.
How can any person call themselves "human" and begrudge someone food and shelter? Bottom line: you can't.
I mean, there's lots of young yobs out there, beating people up, robbing, even murdering people...would you say ALL young people are yobs? No. So then, why do these sub-human neanderhals keep insisting that EVERYONE on benefits is a freeloader?
Perhaps it's the media...they don't show the reality of life on benefits-or without benefits. They only show the abusers and users...then never show the TRUTH, only a skewed portion of it.
So, like people who believe all Muslims are terrorists, or all American Christians are crazy fundamentalists, so many are lead to believe that everyone on benefits is on benefits 'cos they are lazy and shiftless.
I get so MAD when people insinuate that I don't want to work for a living..especially in light that I've done some very physical and very dirty jobs in my time...in light that I've worked, in my time, 9 or 10 hour days, frequently worked 6 or 7 days a week, etc.
Yeah, I'm only working 20 hours a week and collecting benefits. Because I nearly killed myself, working 39+ hours a week, split shifts (day-night both) while I was dreadfully ill and sometimes in awful pain!
Sorry, I'm on a bit of a huff. Some guy put me down yesterday made a cutting remark about me yesterday, when he found out I was working and on benefits. He looked down at me, and used the look and tone of voice that said he considered me a human cockroach. I am still angry enough to chew nails. I bet that arsehole wouldn't be caught dead cleaning loos for a lving, or, folding towels for 8 hours without a break, shoveling manure, cleaning out kennels, or washing dishes for 10 hours at a stretch. I bet that jackarse wouldn't do that, and that's what makes me angry.
Oh, I've worked in offices too, but I do what I have to do, work-wise, whether I like it or not, no matter how low the pay.
I had to deal with that when I was going to college full-time and taking care of mum and the mobile home. One of mum's nurses would also give me that snide, sarcastic voice and the cockroach look, and every time she saw me she'd ask, "have you found a JOB yet?" Grrrr. Good thing I'm not violent, because those people are really asking for a five-fingered answer from me...right on their snoots.
The most salary I've earned in my lifetime, was in 1989-1990, when I was working for a Fortune 500 company in information varification for a copy department. I was earning just over $16,000 a year.
I currently make $9.00 an hour, working about 20 hours a week, the highest hourly wage I've ever earned in my life.
Mostly though, I've a lifetime of minimum wage under my belt.
I had two motivations for going to college full-time at age 39:
1. To lift myself out of poverty and give myself a fighting chance to live a "normal" life.
2. To stay away from the trap of living a life in a totally dead-end job I am not overly fond of, such as my dad did.
Well, neither happened, and all I have to show for it, is that at least I tried to change things--and successfully did for about 5 years-- and didn't sit home collecting benefits whinging about my lot in life.
Still, here I am, worse off (financially and materially) than I was at age 38, back on partial benefits and in a dead-end job. But hey...I tried. (loser)
CURRENT FACTS ON MINIMUM WAGE:
Federal (US govt's official) minimum wage, in 2008, is $6.55 per hour. New York state minimum wage in 2008 is $7.15
Most Americans (58.5%) will spend at least one year below the poverty line at some point between ages 25 and 75
The USA ranks 12th on the HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX.
The current poverty level for a single person in the USA is $10, 400.
Today, without disability benefits, I'd honestly have the choice of either have to work until I literally get so sick I die, or, I would be living on the street or in a welfare motel.
Anyway, that's my story. Here's an article from 2006, that tells it like it is:
By WILLIAM F. BUCKLEY JR., Universal Press Syndicate | November 27, 2006
http://www.nysun.com/opinion/phony-world-of-minimum-wage/44145/
Nancy Pelosi, the new speaker of the House, has told us that as maybe the very first order of business she will call up increasing the minimum wage. Here are the relevant facts:
The federal minimum wage, enacted in 1938, was last raised in 1997. From that point on, with certain exceptions, you could not lawfully hire someone to work without paying him or her at least $5.15 an hour. Paying that much would yield $206 a week, or $10,712 a year. A different federal agency defines poverty as annual earnings of $9,827 or less for a single person. The mathematics of the above informs us that the existing federal minimum wage barely keeps a single worker out of poverty.
Of course, many states and localities have enacted higher minimum wages than the federal one. In San Francisco, you need to pay a worker $8.50 an hour; in New York State, $6.75; in Wisconsin, $5.70.
We learn that 60% of minimum-wage earners — two-thirds of them women — are working in restaurants and bars; 73%, by the way, are white, and 70% have high-school diplomas. Nearly 60% work part time.
Now we can leech from these figures several observations:
(1) It can be very difficult to tell what a minimum-wage worker is actually making. Many of those who work in restaurants and bars receive tips. Then again, the minimum wage is substantially lower for people in that situation.
(2) A high-school diploma will not in and of itself give the worker merchandisable skills o'erleaping the minimum wage.
(3) Since there are part-time workers who receive only the minimum wage, a moment's reflection makes it obvious that they receive, by whatever means, income that makes life possible.
Now on the matter of what to do about it, we should begin by acknowledging that any argument for circumventing the market wage is sophistry. The market will tell you, even in San Francisco, what you need to pay in order to hire an hour's labor. But sophistry is sometimes in order. We do not allow child labor — except in certain circumstances: Peter Pan, at the neighborhood theater, is allowed to work even if he is only 12 years old.
Monopolies are not permitted to set prices. The idea is that in a free society, you must not tolerate any constriction in production. But again, sophistry is permitted, because labor unions, in many fields of endeavor, practice exactly that — a monopoly on the price of labor. What do we do about that? Exactly what we do about waiters who don't list their tips: We ignore it.
We learn that one individual American last year received compensation of $1.5 billion. This leads us indignantly to our blackboard, where we learn that the average chief executive officer earns 1,100 times what a minimum-wage worker earns. What some Americans are being paid every year is describable only as: disgusting.