Everyone's a critic! Actually, I'm not at all opposed to criticism of my writing, really--as long as it's of a constructive nature, I mean, that it's done tactfully, and in a way that I can learn from and hopefully improve my skills, my thinking.
But...I seem to have attracted the wrong type of critic. Yesterday, I got a long, ranting missive, in the comments section of this old Dr Who story that I'm editing/re-writing on this blog, taking on how I was ripping of Dr Who, and that I shouldn't "steal" from the show, that it was all copyrighted, blah-blah-blah. And he wasn't at all nice about it--a right nutter, if you ask me--and even if you don't ask me. Raked me over the verbal coals, up one side and down the other.
Hang about there Mr. Critic!
So, after making like a cyberman and deleting his extremely rude "comments", I wrote my response, thinking that would be the end of it. (Fan fiction IS a legitimate genre, I give copyright credit to the BBC, all the time, and, I DO NOT plagarize. EVER. EVER-EVER-EVER-EVER-EVER. Period. And also, NEVER.)
I mean, where have any of my stories mirrored what was written in Who--besides characters, the Tardis, and other important things needed, that are part of the show, I mean. When the hell have I ever copied storylines from the show? I mean, some of this stuff was written before I even saw Series 2--and only two episodes of Series 1, and all but one (Dream Weavers) was written before November of 2006, so how could I possibly copy stuff in Series 3? Which is what my mystery critic was suggesting. I don't really get why this guy is so angry and wrought up with me.
I've stated repeatedly on this blog, and elsewhere, that I'm NOT a fiction writer! I did some play writing coursework, and some poetry classes, but mostly, I'm trained to be an essayist and a news/PR writer. My studies in fiction writing--2 weeks. That's it. Now, I've been lectured--and lectured, about note-taking and brainstorming and all that stuff that writers are supposed to do. I don't. Well, mostly I don't. I'd say that more than 50 percent of the time that I write fiction--I just sit down and do it, right then and there, off the top of my head. Don't think about plot, or anything. Which is why my fiction is crap. More than half the time, I just make it up as I go along!
I may sweat and fuss and get intensely focused with an essay, news story or feature article, but fiction--bleh. I just do it for fun. To let off some pressure--like a literary fart.
I don't need to copy what's on Dr Who, for pity's sake! What for? Then the work wouldn't be mine--where's the fun in that? Where's the pride in one's work--no matter how bad it is, it's still mine. I don't want to copy other's people's stuff--that'd be like me insulting myself. A creative self-rape.
In particular, this guy wrote, "I think it's wrong of you to rip off the work of Russell Davies."
WHAT??????? I'm not even remotely in the same league as the guys who write Who: Davies, Dicks, Moffat and all the others...dear lord, no. I mean, it's like these guys are on Mars and I'm in an underground cave in China. The gap is that wide. I mean, writing like that, certainly, is something to aspire to--but...no. I'm never going to match that, if I live to be a hundred. I'll never in my lifetime be as good as them, not even fractionally. To suggest that I'm trying to copy Mr Davies...is just...ludicrous. If for no other reason, I...don't know how. I'd love to study under someone like Davies or Moffat--but..how can I imitate them? Their skills and life experiences--and intelligence, is so way over my head...impossible.
Well...no more comments today from Mr. Wonderful (won't disclose his handle, because I don't want to be petty about this--I'm not, being that way, am I?) I thought that was just a one-time thing, no worries.
Nahhh! No such luck. He's baaack! On my e-mail. Oh boy. What a joy to come home to.
Ah well, everyone's a critic. I'll just keep deleting him...unless he finally has something constructive to say???








