I've spent 45% of the last three days in bed, trying to regenerate my health. Unfortunately, I have to walk to the shops and stuff, in the wet snow and raw wind, and that hasn't been helpful for my chest.
Still, I'm coping.
Unfortunately, I am a bit run-down, and the little grey cells are sort of stuck in neutral the last few days--and, i've bruised one finger somehow, and am typing with a sticking plaster on it...not easy to do.
so, don't be expecting a lot of posts from me for a while...oh, I'll get back to it soon, but I'm a bit overwhelmed and brain dysfuctional, at the moment.
There's a reason I went without television for about 4 years, and the last 24 hrs were a prime example. Yesterday, a cable channel showed the film, Thelma & Louise...twice in the same day. Today, it showed it again...at the exact same time that a different cable channel was showing Thelma & Louise. So, I'm paying $10 a month, to watch Thelma and Lousie four times in a 24 hour period. Which I suppose would be fine, if I loved the film. Unfortunately, I don't. It's OK once, but four times is a bit much.
Two other cable channels seem to air the same handful of programmes, over and over and over again. Why? Why bother in investing in a network when you have nothing but the same crap to spew out, day after day? This is why Americans are stupid. They put up with this crap. The only redeeming quality of television for me right now, is Public Broadcasting. And even some fo their programmes are crap...tho far less than the commercial channels.
I tried to watch Dancing With the Stars, but sorry, boring pap just isn't digestible to me. I'd rather read a book. Even that book I saw in the dollar shop a while back, on the history of air conditioning, would be less boring to me, than watching Dancing With the Stars! Outside of Donny Osmond, I didn't recognize a single celebrity on there, and all the banial back chatter of the hosts was making my brain start to ooze out.
Still, there was that Nova documentary Becoming Human, Antiques Roadshow, Eastenders, the film The Man in the Iron Mask (love The Three Musketeers..men and their swords, can't beat that), the running of The Breeder's Cup, and the news from the BBC, so not a total loss.
I went to the local branch of the city library, yesterday. Massive disappointment. I have never seen such a bland and uninteresting and quite frankly, bad, selection of tripe in all my born days. Is this what the locals read? God help me. I wanted an Agatha Christie mystery. There was...none. None! Tons of mystery books, and no Agatha Christie? I did find one paperback of hers, at the last....filed with the "P's." Good greif! What DO the four library people I saw in that one tiny little library branch DO with their time???
My mum had a one-room library when she retired...it was maybe a quarter of the size bigger than this branch. My mum would have a fit if books were shelved wrong! I casually mentioned that I found a Christie book among the "P" authors to the librarian...and he said...NOTHING. Not a word, not even a shrug. He had the personality of a limp dish rag.
I looked up historical fiction--the bulk of it was actually historical romances. OK. I am really getting fed up with these 'new' libraries and librarians. Romance novels are romance novels, historical or otherwise.
Historical fiction is not romance. It is drama, action, etc. Historical fiction does not generally have covers with scantilly clad well-endowed women swooning into the arms of a bare-chested male supermodel look-alike on the cover. WHEN are these STUPID librarians going to get their noses out of their asses, and figure out the difference between historical fiction and historical ROMANCE?
I'm sick of having to look through 15 or 20 romance novels, to find one actual true historical fiction book. I did manage to find a western that I'd not read in years, that I liked, the Christie book and a medevil mystery novel by an author I'd never tried before. I liked the Cadfiel books, so I'm hoping this book will be just as good as those. No Ellis Peters in the local branch library, alas. They had only one Steinbeck and one Conan Doyle, so I'm guessing they're not going to be big on popular literature. They seemed to lean more towards popular fiction and Oprah book club selections...bleh.
I'm not a snob or anything. I'll read comic books and stuff like that. But, I cannot bring myself to read something, just because it's popular, or because some celebrity or critic, or professor or whomever, says they like it. I want to read what I like, not what someone else does. I will read a lot of different stuff, but on my own terms. Basically, if the first few paragraphs of chapter one grab me, I'll read it. If not, I give it a pass. I have favourite genes, yes: historical mystery, westerns, historical fiction. Sometimes I read other stuff: sci-fi and fantasy, sometimes the classics or non-fiction, and sometimes humour and/or general novels.
Yet, there are some genres I avoid like the Biblical plague, such as Romance novels. Bleh! I'm an old maid, I don't do fluffy-wuffy puke-fest romance. In other words, I can't stand it...yet, I have to wade through fluffy novel after fluffy novel, to find an actual work of historical fiction--literature, treasure, not cheap easy-reader mindless trash.
How stupid have we gotten, when we can't even use our grey cells to differentiate between literature and a trashy romance novel? That is just too sad for words, and I despair of ever finding any real librarians left in America.
How bad is it, when one can't tell the rather significant difference between say, a Hortio Hornblower novel, and The Rescue of Princess Bambi?
Ironically, I checked out a non-fiction book while at the library, titled: Americans Are Idiots.
The local postman seems to back up this theory.
I posted my rent check on Wednesday, leaving it sticking out of the mailbox so the postman would see it. Today is Saturday, and as I got my mail, I spied a corner of white sticking out of the bottom of the box. It was my rent check--the postman did not only NOT take my outgoing post---he jammed all the incoming post for the last several days on top of it, so it was jammed down into the bottom of my mailbox--which sits high up on the wall, above my eye-level, and if I hadn't seen that corner of white, I never would have known it hadn't gone out with the post.
Angry doesn't begin to cover how I feel, and my language at this discovery was just a tad rude, I'm afraid.